Karakteristik Butir Soal Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika (Studi Implementasi Praktikum Mahasiswa Jurusan Tadris Matematika di Tingkat MTs/SMP dan MA/SMA Se-NTB)
Keywords:
Characteristics of Mathematical Questions, Junior High School, Senior High SchoolAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out; (1) Characteristics of items for semester exam math questions; (2) Whether or not there is a relationship between the number of items dropped based on the classical test theory using the ITEMAN program by using item analysis based on material, construction, and language in Mathematics. This research is a quantitative descriptive study with a survey approach, namely analyzing the characteristics of the items of the semester exam math questions, which meet the criteria of validity and reliability in theory, namely examining the questions empirically, using classical test theory. The conclusions in this study are; (1) Characteristics of semester exam questions in mathematics subjects, that there are categories accepted, less fulfilling, and many that do not meet, meaning that mathematics teachers must better understand the techniques of composing test instruments and non-tests, to support their skills in structuring questions qualitatively ; (2) There is a relationship between the number of mathematical questions that fall according to classical test theory and item analysis.References
Allen, M., & Yen, W. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Badrun Kartowagiran. (2005). Item and tes analysis (ITEMAN). Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
------. (2005). Perbandingan berbagai metode untuk mendeteksi bias butir. Disertasi doktor, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Bell, F.H. (1981). Teaching and learning mathematics (in secondary shools). Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company.
Dali, S. Naga. (1992) Pengantar teori skor. Jakarta: Gunadarma.
Depdiknas. (2004). Materi pelatihan terintegrasi, matematika. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Depdiknas.
------. (2004). Teknik analisis butir soal instrumen tes dan instrumen non tes. Jakarta.
------. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta.
Djaali., Pudji Muljono. (2007). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. PT. Grasindo. Jakarta
Djemari Mardapi. (1999). Estimasi kesalahan pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan dan implikasinya pada ujian nasional. Yogyakarta: UNY.
-------. (2004). Penyusunan tes hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana UNY.
-------. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.
Fathorrakhman. (2000). Kualitas tes ulangan umum matematika dan kesalahan jawaban siswa madrasah aliyah di provinsi jawa timur tahun pelajaran 1999/2000, Tesis Magister, Tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
WGinsburg, H., & opper, S. (1969). Piaget’s theory of intellectual development. Englewood Sliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
GI Ratnasari. (2010). Pembelajaran Matematika SMA. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Gronlund, N.E. (1985). Measurment and evaluation in teaching (6th.ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing. Co, Inc.
Kabul Mulyana. (2005). Karakteristik soal tes masuk SMP negeri di kabupaten bantul, Tesis Magister, Tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Kumaidi. (2000). Standarisasi Butir Soal. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Maret 2000 (No.022). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sukardi. (2008). Evaluasi Pendidikan. (Prinsip dan Operasionalnya). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Thorndike, M.R. (2005). Measurment and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rine Hart & Winston, Inc.
Turmuzi. (2003). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. UM: Malang.
