Evaluasi Sistem Dashboard Monitoring Presensi Akademik Mahasiswa

Avid  Wijaya

Authors

Avid Wijaya Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang

Keywords:

dashboard, attendance, academic, evaluation, TAM

Abstract

Electronic recording technology for students' student presence can be a solution that minimizes errors in the process of recording and attendance recap. This presence recording makes it easier to process the computerized attendance of students so that attendance data directly enters the computer so that it is easy to process attendance data. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the system used by the user. The method used in this study is an evaluation study using the framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). There are several parameters that are evaluated by the system using these tools, which are related to Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), Behavioral Intention (BI), Actual Usage (AU). Regarding the application of the Dashboard system, the majority of student respondents gave an average of strongly agree on the Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) component of 78, Perceived Usefulness (PU) of 73.8, Behavioral Intention (BI) of 76.8, Actual Usage (AU) of 78.87. The system used has an impact on the implementation of monitoring the presence of students in lectures. Administrative and academic staff and students can quickly find out the presence information that is recapitulated in the system. In addition, superiors can also get data and information from these absences as a basis for decision making policies.

References

Davis, F. D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory And Results. Massachusetts Institute Of Technology. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3652.1648

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Gining, R. A. J. M., Fauzi, S. S. M., Ayub, I. M., Jamaluddin, M. N. F., Puspitasari, I., & Okfalisa. (2019). Design and development of activity attendance monitoring system based on RFID. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 17(1), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i1.pp500-507

Hirschheim, R. (2007). Introduction to the Special Issue on “Quo Vadis TAM - Issues and Reflections on Technology Acceptance Research.” J. AIS, 8. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00128

Poster, D. D. (2010). A Guide to Creating Dashboards People Love to Use, (November 2009).

Rozanda, N. E., & Masriana, A. (2017). Perbandingan Metode Hot Fit dan Tam dalam Mengevaluasi Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Kepegawaian (SIMPEG) (Studi Kasus : Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pekanbaru). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi, Komunikasi Dan Industri (SNTIKI) 9, ISSN (Prin, 18–19.

Sarikaya, A., Correll, M., Bartram, L., Tory, M., & Fisher, D. (2019). What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Dashboards? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1), 682–692. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864903

Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., & Petersen, C. (2019). Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100, 103315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315

Utari, D. A. T. (2017). Rancang Bangun Dashboard System Untuk Pemantauan Perkuliahan Pada Program Studi. INSTITUT BISNIS DAN INFORMATIKA STIKOM SURABAYA.

Yusof, MM; Paul, RJ; and Stergioulas, L. (2006). Towards a framework for Health Information System Evaluation, School of Information System. Proceedings of The 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 00(C), 1–10.